Al Francesco’s contribution: He helped establish organized blackjack team play, separating table observation from larger bets through the “Big Player” concept. His story shows both the influence of cooperation and the limits of reported gambling successes.
When it comes to blackjack legends they don’t get much bigger…
Al Francesco is widely regarded as the man who introduced the concept of blackjack team play and the “Big Player”, which later influenced blackjack teams around the world, including the famous MIT blackjack team. Francesco is a blackjack pioneer.
Francesco began betting on card games while growing up in Gary, Indiana. In Richard W. Munchkin’s published interview, he said he became a strong rummy player and was making about $5,000 a year from gambling before turning to blackjack. That is a first-person biographical claim, not an independently audited total.
Edward O. Thorp published Beat the Dealer in 1962. Francesco recalled beginning blackjack in 1963 after reading the book, having recently moved to California. The card counting concepts described by Thorp seemed simple enough to Francesco and he was eager to try them out at the blackjack tables. With only a basic grasp of the principles in Thorp’s book, Francesco hit the casinos.
In a published interview, Francesco recalled that the first time he counted cards he developed a headache within 20 minutes. He described Thorp’s Ten Count as extremely difficult and said he returned home to study before trying again. The anecdote is Francesco’s recollection, not an independently verified session record.
Francesco said that after more practice he could keep up with the dealer and increased his wagers as his bankroll grew. He also recalled that, after about a year and a half, he was being barred frequently and stopped playing blackjack for roughly eight years. These are attributed first-person statements rather than universal claims about every casino.
According to the same interview, Francesco returned when four-deck games appeared, learned Lawrence Revere’s Advanced Point Count and played for about a month before encountering renewed scrutiny. He said this led him to seek a less conspicuous approach. The source does not establish that every casino shared information or that individual card counting had become almost impossible everywhere.
Francesco recalled developing the Big Player approach around 1971–1972 after studying Lawrence Revere’s method. He assembled players who could coordinate their observations and wagers. A seven-person arrangement—six spotters and one Big Player—is one way to describe that division of labor, rather than a fixed size for every team. In Munchkin’s interview, Francesco recalled three teammates on his first trip as the Big Player; the Hall’s Blair Hull biography describes a later team with twenty-two members.
Their job was to locate the tables with a high count. The other member was the Big Player. The Big Player would be signaled by another member of the team and sit down at the hot table. The Big Player would portray himself as a tourist or first-time gambler who just got lucky. The arrangement could make the team’s coordinated action less obvious to casino personnel.
In the spotter–Big Player arrangement described here, the large bettor relied on information from the spotter instead of independently maintaining the entire prior count. Spotters used smaller wagers, often the table minimum, while identifying favorable conditions. These roles describe the historical concept, not a guarantee that every team used identical bets or procedures.
Francesco would personally recruit the members of his team. Not long after he began using team blackjack play, Al recruited a young man who was a prodigy. He became one of the team’s best-known members. The young man’s name was Ken Uston, and he wrote about his experiences with Francesco’s team in The Big Player.
Uston’s publication of The Big Player disclosed how Francesco’s teams operated and caused a falling-out that lasted for years. The Blackjack Hall of Fame says the two later repaired their relationship. Their later reconciliation followed that prolonged disagreement, according to the Hall’s Uston biography.
Francesco was nominated in 2002 for the Blackjack Hall of Fame’s inaugural cohort. He became one of its seven original members after final voting at the January 2003 Blackjack Ball. The Hall identifies Al Francesco as Frank Schipani and records that he died on February 4, 2024, at age 90.
The Blackjack Hall of Fame credits Francesco’s teams with extracting millions from casinos and says later prominent teams used the Big Player concept. Those are institutional biographical claims, not independently audited totals for every team. The approach remains historically influential, but results vary and no team method guarantees a profit.
What team play changes—and what it does not
Dividing observation and betting between people changes how information and capital are coordinated. It does not change the value of a particular hand simply because a teammate plays it. The shared bankroll must absorb every participating wager, including the small bets placed while waiting for a favorable situation.
Consider an invented one-hour model, not a reconstruction of Francesco’s results. Suppose all spotters together make three hundred dollars in initial wagers with an assumed 0.5% disadvantage, while the large bettor makes one thousand dollars in initial wagers with an assumed 0.8% player advantage. The rates already include the strategy and any double/split effects of each model; side bets are excluded.
| Activity | Calculation | Expected net result |
|---|---|---|
| Spotter wagers combined | $300 × −0.005 | −$1.50 |
| Large-bettor wagers | $1,000 × 0.008 | +$8.00 |
| Team total before expenses | $8.00 − $1.50 | +$6.50 |
| After an assumed $4 expense | $6.50 − $4.00 | +$2.50 |
Neither the assumed advantage nor those wager totals is guaranteed to be available. Waiting, entry restrictions and mistakes can change them. Two dollars and fifty cents is an expected average under the assumptions, not an hourly salary, a maximum loss or a reason to risk an unaffordable bankroll. The calculation also does not determine risk of ruin: wager sizes, outcome distributions and dependence between hands require separate analysis.
This explains why a successful-looking large bettor is not enough to evaluate a team. Money won by one member may be offset by other members’ wagers and expenses. A transfer of chips between teammates changes who holds the bankroll, not the team’s profit. Historical reports of winnings should therefore be understood with their stated scope, while uncertain private accounting remains uncertain.
More to read
Further reading
Blackjack involves financial risk. Set affordable limits before playing, and see the responsible-gambling policy if play stops being recreational.
